As you will have comprised, our Writing has made a hard job. It has succeeded to contact one of the sviluppatori of the Rand Cam Engine, to interview it (part of the interview is brought back at the bottom) and to having ulterior clarifications. We have, moreover consulted sources of Italian private right and American. In all this us two things seem clear:
1 - The issue of the context. From always we say that every event goes contestualizzato. The issue Rand Cam has happened in the United States where vige a various ordering trades them and where the words “action” and “society” have various senses regarding our ordering.
2 - The issue of the not-news. The articles that exist on this matter do not bring back some direct and inconfutabile test. All are based on hypothesis and speculations. It happens with the Rand-Cam case which happens, in the Italian journalism, with the news fill-in, that is filling. Example: two politicians meet themselves to the bar of the chamber of deputies under the eyes of a journalist. The journalist, having to fill up some given columns and not having, will write that “they will sure have spoken of.” and “it is not possible that they have not said themselves…” and therefore via. But if us fairies case the news, that true one, not is.
In the event Rand Cam not is neither news neither test. There is only the history, much human, of two men to the taken ones with an invention greater than they, taken from large economic problems (like evince from the interview from we carried out) and swept up from the situation.
A reader who has deepened issue RAND CAM is on our situated one that on others to not favorable we has written to us:
“Already I have said and I repeat that the WT has not never manufactured crews, it is directly (and it would lack to us!!!) he is indirectly. Who supports this is Without a doubt a slanderer one! ”, concluding: ” I you ringrazio truly a lot for all the one which you have made for me in order to clear the vicissitude… and I assure you that if in future I will meet of new on my road issue RAND CAM, that one exposed before will be my judgment on the issue "
Expressions as this us rinfrancano and ricompensano to us for all the made job. We have not never had the pretension to defend always and dogmatially the Watch Tower Society. We are not its apologists of office. Our virtue and our retaggio are to serve the truth. We believe that who wants to make a service the truth must make careful searches and say the things therefore as is. We have the conscience to place. The same thing cannot say who to it has lost its obbiettività and pushed from livore and rancor it omits to make careful searches and nozzle improbable accusations. We do not believe sleeps peacefully. At least they do not give hour and for this issue.
Part of the rilasciata interview the 2.02.2004
Tdgonline: Who was the owner of the Rand Cam
D.B.R.: Jim McCann
Tdgonline: Us you can explain the issue of the compartecipazione of the Watch Tower?
D.B.R.: Jim put 51% percento of the Rand Cam in society with the Watch Tower vincolando the profits at the moment in which the Rand Cam she would have caught up its sold scope and all.
Tdgonline: Therefore the Watch Tower would have taken the moneies single to made games?
D.B.R.: I do not believe that Jim would have poured null to the Watch Tower also after to have embedded from the sale to the Reg Tech
Tdgonline: Why you have this feeling?
D.B.R.: Because Jim promised to many very but the only thing that it has made has been to pocket all the moneies and to scappare in the Central America.
Tdgonline: Jim McCann is a Witness of Geova?
D.B.R.: until the last time that I saw, yes! … but you know the dollars make one strange effect sometimes.
Tdgonline: Why Jim donated 51% of the Rand Cam to the Watch Tower?
D.B.R.: it was all bound to its control.
Tdgonline: OK! But because Jim wanted to donate 51% to the Watch Tower?
D.B.R.: … you see… Jim always has shown a species of benefactor of the humanity but she did not have some sense of the transactions. The true reasons have become clear endured after that is disappeared with the moneies.
Tdgonline: That you know, Jim has never transmitted to some action or document to the Watch Tower?
D.B.R.: Not. It did not make it.
Tdgonline: D., you a six Witness of Geova?
D.B.R.: Yes it they are, even if inactive. I have passed a great ugly period… but now it is improving.
Marcadores