Rotacion de los cuerpos y Gravedad

[higinio]

Buenos dias. Tengo una duda sobre la " paradoja de Aspden " ( HAROLD ASPDEN, Harold Aspden PhD.(Cantab), B.Sc., F.I.E.E., F.I.Mech.E., M.Inst P., F.I.C.P.A., C.,Eng., C.Phys. Sen.Wh.Sc., is considered by many as a brilliant theoretical physicist, electrical engineer and inventor from Southampton, England. His career in patents resulted in his being I.B.M.'s Director of European Patents for many years. ) Por favor, busquesé en google este nombre harold aspden.

Esta paradoja consiste en que está comprobado experimentalmente que si arrojas un cuerpo ( por ejemplo una bola de billar ) hacia arriba imprimiendole tambien ( ademas del de impulso hacia arriba ) un movimiento de rotación, sube MAS ALTO Y CAE MAS DEPRISA que el mismo objeto, con identico impulso, pero SIN ROTAR.
Agradeceria comentarios.
Harold's Books

THE PHYSICS OF CREATION
CREATION THE PHYSICAL TRUTH
PHYSICS UNIFIED
PHYSICS WITHOUT EINSTEIN
MODERN AETHER SCIENCE

Harold's Papers


BIBLIOGRAPHY
DISCOURSES

ENERGY SCIENCE ESSAYS

ENERGY SCIENCE REPORTS

ENERGY SCIENCE RESEARCH FORUM

ESSAYS 2000 SERIES

FEEDBACK NOTES

KEYNOTES
LECTURES
RESEARCH PAPERS
RESEARCH NOTES
TUTORIAL LESSONS

[higinio]

Otra forma de esta paradoja es esta: se refiere a la energia necesaria para arrancar un motor, que es menor cuando se le ha arrancado y dejado parar previamente. Menor, nó. Bastante menor.:

The following is a paper by Harold Aspden published in New Energy News, volume 2, No. 2 (February), pp. 1-2 (1995).
'Discovery of Virtual Inertia'


I report an anomalous energy phenomenon found in my motor experiments.

Imagine an electric machine having no electrical input itself and which, when started on no load by a drive motor and brought up to speed (3250 rpm), thereafter runs steadily at that speed with the motor drawing a little extra input power with a time delay rate of about two minutes. The machine rotor has a mass of 800 gm and at that speed its kinetic energy together with that of the drive motor is no more than 15 joules, contrasting with the excess energy of 300 joules needed to satisfy the anomalous power surge [to spin up from rest].

Imagine further that when the motor, after running five minutes or more, is switched off and the machine is stopped, you can restart it in the same or opposite direction and find that it now has a memory in the sense that it will not now ask for that 300 joules of excess input. 30 joules will suffice provided that the time lapse between starting and restarting is no more than a minute or so.

This is not a transient heating phenomenon. At all times the bearing housings feel cool and any heating in the drive motor would imply an increase of resistance and a build-up of power to a higher steady state condition.

The experimental evidence is that there is something spinning of an ethereal nature coextensive with the machine rotor. That 'something' has an effective mass density 20 times that of the rotor, but it is something that can spin independently and take several minutes to decay, whereas the motor comes to rest in a few seconds.

Two machines of different rotor size and composition reveal the phenomenon and tests indicate variations with time of day and compass orientation of the spin axis. One machine, the one incorporating weaker magnets, showed evidence of gaining strength magnetically, as the test were repeated over several days.

[coele]

Hola,
Yo creo que puede ser verdad, pero debido a la fuerza de rozamiento con el aire, que al rotar hará un efecto diferente y ofrecerá menos rozamiento. En otro caso, según la teoría, la aceleración de la gravedad en el cuerpo debería ser la misma.

[Emeric]

Sigan aportando. :yo:

[Emeric]

http://www.colegioblestgana.cl/wp-content/uploads/old/Prohibidos_Trolls.jpg?v=1314884922841

[Emeric]

No les hagan caso a los TROLLS, y sigan participando. :yo:

[Emeric]

https://img.desmotivaciones.es/201012/members_avatar_29359.jpg